from EStream, Panopto or other systems) Īnd finally for more information on the VTT format see this excellent page. send this link to your institutional zoom administrator see )Ī cool free online tool for converting other transcript formats (e.g. (1998) On the Potentialities and Problems of a Various additional links and notes:īits about zoom needing transcripts switched on and how to do this (ie.e. (2007) A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research, Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE. Holstein (eds) Handbook of the Interview Research: Context and Method, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage pp. (2002) ‘The History of the Interview,’ in J. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods (2010) Broken Devices and New Opportunities: Re-imagining the tools of Qualitative Research. The result is a kind of inertia, as Roger Stack argues: “It would appear that after the invention of the tape-recorder, much of sociology took a deep sigh, sank back into the chair and decided to think very little about the potential of technology for the practical work of doing sociology” (Slack 1998: 1.10). The strength of this impulse is widely evident from the methodological design of undergraduate dissertations to multimillion pound research grant applications. David Silverman argues that the reliance on these techniques has limited the sociological imagination: “Qualitative researchers’ almost Pavlovian tendency to identify research design with interviews has blinkered them to the possible gains of other kinds of data” (Silverman 2007: 42). For qualitative researchers the tape-recorder became the prime professional instrument intrinsically connected to capturing human voices on tape in the context of interviews. Over the past 50 years the habitual nature of our research practice has obscured serious attention to the precise nature of the devices used by social scientists (Platt 2002, Lee 2004). This quote has been too true for too long: I’m kind of hoping that the sudden shifts the pandemic has caused in practice and process might lead to some developments and rethinking of analysis. I also think this really gives the lie to the idea that manual transcription is “the best way” to get in touch with audio. I’ve had a lot of help and encouragement – see acknowledgements below – but also NEED from students and groups who are wondering how to do transcription better. So this has been a real focus for me recently. The blog bit – background, next steps, context ResourcesĮxample project file NVivo R1 (Windows) hereĮxample media file and VTT file from the first video also available here. But not only corrections! You can also annotate the transcript, label speakers and even start coding at this stage. This process allows you to now use the powerful tools within NVivo to playback the audio / video (including slowing playback speed,adjusting volume and setting rewind intervals when you press play/pause + keyboard shortcuts for the play/pause functions) whilst you read the transcript and make corrections. You can also (currently) upload videos to Stream or use a wide range of other applications and system to create an automatic transcript of a media file. The introductory video was created with Teams, another was created in Zoom. Step One – Create a media file with subtitle file in VTT formatĭepending where you start there are a few ways this will work – all have the same end point: a media file and a VTT transcript.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |